How can footfall and transport be used innovatively to generate income and improve environmental sustainability in the City?
The Challenge 4 team would like to say heartfelt thanks for all the fantastic contributions that were received on this Challenge. We knew from the wide and varied responses that whittling down the ideas for our first workshop, held last Thursday would be a challenge in itself. The ideas which were initially shortlisted down to 10 led to fabulous presentations from the idea generators themselves and a real chance for us to start visualising some of these ideas in and around the City!
If choosing a shortlist of 10 ideas was difficult, then narrowing these down even further has become near on impossible. So now we need your help! Of our 10 shortlisted ideas we would like you to vote for your top 3. You will find further information on the 10 below, which we hope will give you a further insight into what the ideas are about and how they will work.
The closing date for the vote is Friday 6th April.
Once the closing date has been reached and the votes have been counted, the top 3 will then be taken forward for further consideration, with the aim of bringing these ideas and solutions to life. A workshop will be held to refine the preferred solutions and explore any possible challenges that may prevent the solutions development. With the help of the original idea generator, and those interested parties who can assist us, we hope to implement the ‘winning’ solutions in the next stage of this exciting journey.
The Shortlisted Ideas
Based on an initial evaluation of all submitted solutions the following 10 solutions were shortlisted (for more details on the shortlisting process visit the Challenge 4 workshop presentation attached).
To take the challenge to the next phase of development (detailed project feasibility, deliverability and resources needed), we need you to vote for your top 3 solutions to challenge 4.
Here are the ‘top 10’ ideas for you to choose from:
1. Sponsor a street
This solution is about increasing the number of pedestrainised streets in York and paying for it through sponsorship opportunities – similar to sponsored roundabouts. The pedestrianisation of a street is paid for by sponsorship from individuals, tourists and local businesses with some visual recognition of this contribution – i.e. paving slab with names on. It would be supported by a website.
Pros: Promotes ownership of a street; Could support the financing of more pedestrian streets in York;
Cons: Possible maintenance costs of the scheme after the initial work is carried out; Vandalism;
2. Energy generating pavements
This solution identifies innovative technology that can capture and generate renewable energy from the motion of walking in busy areas. The technology, embedded in pavements, can harness energy as you walk over it walk to generate electricity to light up local street lights, pavement lights and even information boards – perhaps with data that makes energy and environmental sustainability more visible. It can even save on lighting bills. In Parliament Street alone footfall was 8.4 million in 2011 – think of all that wasted energy we could use.
Pros: Powerful and visual education tool to highlight the need for renewable energy sources in a fun way with added health benefits; Trial-able, and if successful could link to planned regeneration works and new developments across the city;
3. Cycle counters and Air Pollution real time displays
This solution is about visually highlighting information to demonstrate the impact of 'journeys' in the City. The proposal contained two ideas, signs to show many people cycle in the city, and signs to show the air quality at certain points in the City (using green if below 30 mgm3, amber if 30-40 mgm3 and red if over 40 mgm3, the EU limit). These are not currently instantly visible across the city and such displays will raise awareness of these important environmental sustainability issues and encourage people to take action.
Pros: Powerful, visual and positive educational tool; Trial-able way of changing behaviours through positive ‘nudges’ such as celebrating the number of cyclists in York or air quality improvements;
4. Energy generating exercise bikes
This solution is about using people to sit on exercise bikes and generate electricity that could generate income and help improve health across the city. The solution could also utilise an existing asset (see challenge 1) and provide a lower cost alternative to private gym memberships.
Pros: Straightforward, energetic, good for all, cheaper to use than sports centres and with a social aspect; Pilot-able in energy bikes but could be applied to libraries, schools, internet cafe and to power laptops / other electronic devices;
5. Open Data Sharing
This solution is about a website to collate and publicly make available detailed information on transport, air quality and carbon emissions across the city so that we can use this data to highlight, target and solve issues. It can also be used identify cost effective improvements to change local behaviours across the city.
Pros: Data is good in order to understand a problem and solve issues; Like the web site idea as a tool for educating people on environmental issues (could link with solution 1 - counters and displays above);
Cons: Difficult to coordinate; Management of the site and data quality;
6. Low emission Mini-Bus fleet for schools and community groups
This solution reflects a current problem for schools, which have to sometimes use many private cars or old, highly inefficient, polluting vehicles to transport children on field trips and visits. The idea is to have a low emission minibus that could be hired (for a charged) to ensure school travel is easier for teachers and parents and it is environmentally friendly. As there is a charge, the scheme may create revenue to support itself and to be financially sustainable. When schools do not need it, it could also be offered to communities for use.
Pros: Council could operate as a company enterprise and could centrally manage this and the maintenance; Sharing a bus is a good thing economically and will save schools money;
7. Road Trains
This solution relates to an environmentally friendly road train system linking the city’s major attractions and key services such as the rail station. The modern, lightweight road train, inspired by the NRM’s road train, would be powered by electricity or other sustainable fuel and be a fun and practical service for residents, tourists and people with limited mobility to use. The idea suggested could be branded the Little Green Train and it would offer an enjoyable and people-friendly alternative to the car/large buses, capitalise on York’s railway history and acumen and has the potential to deliver an transport solution that would be economically and environmentally sustainable.
Pros: Keep big buses out of the city; Road train (perhaps entitled Little green trains) – is very appropriate to York. York is a railway city and this is a fun way for people to get around. It could create a tourism brand and is suitable for the small narrow streets in York;
8. Digital Display signs
Similar to idea 3 (above), this solution is based on the use of ‘smart signage’ to influence the behaviour of the City’s residents. Information that could be displayed for this purpose at various locations across our transport network includes vehicle counters (by type), countdowns to traffic light changes, journey times and alternatives, and ‘promotional’ messages for more environmentally friendly transportation.
Pros: Powerful , visual and positive educational tool; Trial-able way of changing behaviours through positive ‘nudges’ such as promoting quicker transport methods/routes.
Cons: Lots of signs can be confusing; Advertising congestion levels could have a negative impact on the city and local businesses;
9. Free City Centre Shuttle Bus
A frequent, free, low emission bus service linking the main rail station, car parks, shopping areas, businesses, hotels, York Hospital and any other appropriate and notable city locations. Cities such as Manchester, Bradford & Cardiff already use a version of this solution which would include low floors and easy access for wheelchairs, pushchairs etc.
Pros: Free travel throughout the City Centre area; Reduction in city centre congestion if becoming a preferred method of transport.
Cons: Costs to run; Negative impact on current bus provider(s);
10. Smart Parking Tickets
The introduction of ‘smart’ parking tickets which would be used to gather user information such as postcode travelled from, reason for visit and number of passengers. Along with derived data such as arrival & departures times the information can then be used to optimise car parking provision, predict parking revenues and predict traffic patterns.
Pros: Easy method of capturing data; Increased intelligence to be used when making traffic/city centre policies.
Cons: Increase in time to obtain parking tickets for customers; Perceived ‘big-brother’ intrusion.
How To Vote
We would like you to vote for your top 3 solutions.
To vote for your favourite ideas please reply to this discussion below and rank the ideas in order of preference (i.e. 1 = Favourite, 2 = 2nd Favourite, 3 = 3rd Favourite). An example is shown below.
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Thanks for the votes so far, and I just wanted to add that we will be looking at issues such as finance, resources, examples of similar projects else where etc at the next stage of the short listing process for this challenge. Some initial feasibility was considered in the initial round of short listing, but once the closing date for votes has been reached, the top 3 solutions voted for will be taken forward for further detailed consideration and feasibility. A workshop will be held to refine the preferred solutions and explore any possible challenges that may prevent the solutions development.
Keep the votes coming in. The deadline is 6th April.
Thanks for explaining the process further Jacqueline.
One more question if I may.
What will happen if one(or more) of the 3 ideas chosen then gets rejected further down the line?
Will the idea with the next number of votes take it's place?
That is a good question, but since the money available is piffling and only one idea from York is likely to stand any chance of going anywhere, I suspect it is probably irrelevant. Those running the project will decide what they want to put forward, guided by the voting but beholden to it, as with most council 'consultations'
1) Low emission bus for schools and community groups
2) Free shuttle bus
3) Open data sharing
I suspect the exercise bikes would struggle to generate as much energy as it took to manufacture them.
Green party again.
Why does every vote from the Green party include comments attacking the other ideas or bigging up your own?
Can't you just stick to voting instead of spreading propaganda?
Also just to rebuff your uncalled for slur on Energy Bikes, it's about more than the energy generation capacity of the bikes.
It's about providing lower cost fitness facilities for York residents on moderate/low income who are just seeing their Council tax rise to pay for things that they get no benefit from.
It's about getting people fitter and more active. Helping them to live more healthy lifestyles and save the NHS a fortune on treatment of diseases linked to lack of exercise(Cancer/heart disease diabetes to name a few).
It's about encouraging people to get interested in cycling, get on their bike and leave the car at home helping to reduce congestion on the roads and do something about the air pollution problem in the city at present. Don't get me wrong I'm all for air quality monitoring so we can see why we are choking, I'd just rather do something about the problem other than talk about it while we suffocate.
And yes it's about generating green energy in a carbon neutral way instead of burning more fossil fuel or exposing us to the dangers of nuclear power.
It's funny how the most environmentally friendly options are being voted down by the Greens.
What exactly do you stand for?
Just because someone is a member of the Green party doesnt mean they have less right to contribute. You wouldnt lump people together because they had foreign names or say all the men on here respond in a certain way. There is no 'party line' (check what people have opted for in their votes) and if you are going to the trouble to research individuals, you will also find votes from a significant number of council employees and science city people who presumably have friends involved in setting up the project. My only regret now is investing effort something which has manifestly failed to engage a wider section of York population and the local media in looking at the ideas we have all put forward.
Where is the rest of the population, the Lib Dem, Tory and Labour supporters then? Answer not interested! Please stop bringing politics into this all the time!
Firstly, another big thank you to everyone who has voted so far. Your time & votes are much appreciated.
Without aiming to stifle free speech, I would be grateful if those who have already voted refrained from using the voting thread for criticism, personal or otherwise, of other contributors and ideas.
One of the benefits of using an open forum is its ability to generate and provoke discussion and we would like to continue to encourage this discussion on the merits and drawbacks of each idea. However, there is always the danger that this becomes blurred and the aim of the discussion is lost.
We're excited about the potential in all the shortlisted ideas and looking forward to working on further developing these into something real. I hope people continue to vote and contribute in that spirit.
Neil (member of the GeniUS! Team)
i just want to vote, i'll leave the commenting for the ill informed on the york press site
2)energy generating bicycles
3)energy generating pavements
1. Energy generating pavements
2. Low Emission mini bus fleet
3. Smart parking meters
This is the most ridiculous voting system ever! Do we live the 21st Century?
Vote 1 - Energy generating pavements
Vote 2 - Road Trains
Vote 3 - Smart Parking Tickets